Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?

[Pascal Obry <pascal@obry.net>]

Dmitry,

> I presented no examples at all. How could I, if XML has no use in my eyes?

I've followed this discussion a bit... No enough time to understand all
your points! All this looks quite silly to me, XML (is a kind of
new/simplified SGML) is a way to make structured information. It is
probably possible to do the same with CSV, or with some other structured
language... Maybe? And what's the point? It is of course possible to
rewrite every Ada code into C, or C++ or whatever...

So what's your problem with XML? Heavy language? Not that much when you
need to define precisely information... I've been working during a long
time into a TI department, so that could explain that... Before XML many
people were defining their own language to store/exchange information.
That was wrong. It was so because SGML was too big, too complex to
handle. XML is a somewhat a good compromise. We may do better, but at
least that's a good current solution to me.

My 2 cents!

Pascal.

-- 

--|------------------------------------------------------
--| Pascal Obry                           Team-Ada Member
--| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE
--|------------------------------------------------------
--|    http://www.obry.net  -  http://v2p.fr.eu.org
--| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination"
--|
--| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B