From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_MUA_MOZILLA autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9983e856ed268154 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Received: by 10.66.74.69 with SMTP id r5mr2593310pav.12.1345562989995; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.235.217 with SMTP id u67mr1038997weq.9.1345562989777; Tue, 21 Aug 2012 08:29:49 -0700 (PDT) Path: kg8ni10357pbc.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!r1no22078229qas.0!news-out.google.com!n2ni244147288win.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!193.252.117.184.MISMATCH!feeder.news.orange.fr!not-for-mail Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2012 17:29:49 +0200 From: Pascal Obry Organization: Home - http://www.obry.net User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; fr-FR; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090605 Thunderbird/2.0.0.22 Mnenhy/0.7.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec? References: <501bd285$0$6564$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <502bd3e6$0$6574$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <17qgsq5y7or0v.16z18fmcew1lt$.dlg@40tude.net> <502c149e$0$6579$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <502cd701$0$6568$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <502d3c68$0$6572$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <502e9039$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <40tmogy4d1b5.1kc2gm8qfrkdu.dlg@40tude.net> <503240ed$0$6569$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <50326457$0$6576$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1qril0ny3eczr$.1vlhpbrjyyb8k.dlg@40tude.net> <503375ac$0$6565$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1vglgit7vnu4l$.2ytljabrhk2.dlg@40tude.net> <5033986c$0$6573$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net> In-Reply-To: <62h5nifarvom.1myeqdyevhefq.dlg@40tude.net> Message-ID: <5033a96d$0$6172$ba4acef3@reader.news.orange.fr> NNTP-Posting-Date: 21 Aug 2012 17:29:49 CEST NNTP-Posting-Host: 90.2.57.58 X-Trace: 1345562989 reader.news.orange.fr 6172 90.2.57.58:5612 X-Complaints-To: abuse@orange.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: 2012-08-21T17:29:49+02:00 List-Id: Dmitry, > I presented no examples at all. How could I, if XML has no use in my eyes? I've followed this discussion a bit... No enough time to understand all your points! All this looks quite silly to me, XML (is a kind of new/simplified SGML) is a way to make structured information. It is probably possible to do the same with CSV, or with some other structured language... Maybe? And what's the point? It is of course possible to rewrite every Ada code into C, or C++ or whatever... So what's your problem with XML? Heavy language? Not that much when you need to define precisely information... I've been working during a long time into a TI department, so that could explain that... Before XML many people were defining their own language to store/exchange information. That was wrong. It was so because SGML was too big, too complex to handle. XML is a somewhat a good compromise. We may do better, but at least that's a good current solution to me. My 2 cents! Pascal. -- --|------------------------------------------------------ --| Pascal Obry Team-Ada Member --| 45, rue Gabriel Peri - 78114 Magny Les Hameaux FRANCE --|------------------------------------------------------ --| http://www.obry.net - http://v2p.fr.eu.org --| "The best way to travel is by means of imagination" --| --| gpg --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key F949BD3B