Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?

["Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>]

Georg Bauhaus <rm.dash-bauhaus@futureapps.de> писал(а) в своём письме Wed,  
22 Aug 2012 16:49:35 +0400:

> It seems the easiest, even in comparison to HTML, in that---for the
> service in question---everything needed to handle XML is in place,
> including transformation machinery.

While you are right here, It is very important to address to the fact that  
every modern
browser (even in phone) does such transformations on-the-fly (aka xslt  
transforms),
this means that html in car server-side is useless and even scrape and  
dirty thing,
while xml gives only relevant data to be transformed into readable thing  
by client-side machinery.

I suppose that not all readers of this topic can look at this fact  
properly, but probably
tend to see it as a mess with all these "visual" CSS and javascript nicery  
embedded just
inside into a hardware sensor.

Regarding to project/compilation data produced by compiler in xml form,
the above means that it is possible to read such data just having
only any modern html browser, which will make done such transformations  
into desired readable form.
For example it is what adabrowse tool does, indeed.

-- 
Написано в почтовом клиенте браузера Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/