Re: Should Inline be private in the private part of a package spec?

["Vasiliy Molostov" <molostoff@gmail.com>]

Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com> писал(а) в своём письме Fri, 10 Aug 2012  
20:45:03 +0400:


> Indeed so. In fact, I think that's just scraping the surface of how an  
> OS should handle files. It should have files [strongly-]typed, perhaps  
> with a validated flag to indicate that that type is known to be true  
> (perhaps the type indicator implemented as a signed 64-bit integer,  
> which would have a magnitude indicating the file-type; negative values  
> indicating non-validated files. [0 would be a straight-up binary file,  
> as all files would be binary it makes no sense for validation thereon;  
> the extra-negative value, assuming 2's complement, could indicate truly  
> unknown]). Furthermore, each file-type should have a corresponding  
> object which knows how to read, write & validate itself.

Perhaps you might know that ada.direct_io is a carbon copy of record  
oriented files implemented in vms,
and a rest (historical sublime) of that file system is currently named as  
ntfs?

-- 
Написано в почтовом клиенте браузера Opera: http://www.opera.com/mail/