comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Leake <Stephen.Leake@gsfc.nasa.gov>
Subject: Re: Elimination of "use" clauses
Date: 1999/07/02
Date: 1999-07-02T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ubtdvylsh.fsf@gsfc.nasa.gov> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ligdq$c8q$1@nnrp1.deja.com

Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:

> In article <7lh74s$v36$1@nnrp1.deja.com>,
>   Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> wrote:
> > In article <377B5807.88B875E0@cs.york.ac.uk>,
> >   Neil.Audsley@cs.york.ac.uk wrote:
> > >
> > > We have a lot of Ada source that "with"s and "use"s a lot of
> > packages --
> > > to the extent that it is difficult and time-consuming to find
> > out which
> > > package a procedure is actually from.
> > I don't know of a dotification tool, but it seems strange to
> > claim that it is difficult and time-consuming to find out
> > which package a procedure is from. That sounds like you are
> > not using appropriate tools. Try using the EMACS interface
> 
> While I appreciate the fact that *some* compiler systems have facilites
> to help decipher stuff like this under *certian* circumstances, I am not
> persuaded that obtuse source code is just a "tool problem".
> 
> If I have to use specialized tools to figure out what someone's source
> code is doing, the tool that springs most readily to mind is a baseball
> bat...

The code reading tool is no more "specialized" than the compiler!

Borland provides a similar tool for C++, and DEC Ada 83 provided a
similar tool in conjunction with LSE. ObjectAda and GNAT both provide
such tools; I would reject any compiler that did not. 

With such a tool, you can understand more complex programs than
without such a tool. It is just one more aspect of the art of
programming.

Of course, there is no substitute for well written code, but I have no
problem assuming the availability of appropriate code reading tools
when judging what is well written.

For instance, I find it harder to read code without syntax
colorization. I don't think this is a problem, since colorization is
so widely available. The same is now true of cross reference tools;
they are widely available, so I am comfortable relying on them.

-- Stephe




  reply	other threads:[~1999-07-02  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-07-01  0:00 Elimination of "use" clauses Dr. Neil C. Audsley
1999-07-01  0:00 ` Joe Wisniewski
1999-07-01  0:00 ` czgrr
1999-07-01  0:00   ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-02  0:00     ` czgrr
1999-07-02  0:00       ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-01  0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-07-02  0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-02  0:00   ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-02  0:00     ` Stephen Leake [this message]
1999-07-02  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
     [not found]       ` <7ltus1$ah1@dfw-ixnews19.ix.netcom.com>
1999-07-13  0:00         ` Robert A Duff
1999-07-18  0:00           ` Richard D Riehle
1999-07-18  0:00             ` jerry
1999-07-19  0:00               ` Vladimir Olensky
1999-07-20  0:00               ` Richard D Riehle
1999-07-20  0:00                 ` jerry
1999-07-20  0:00                 ` Opaque Types (was Elimination of "use" clauses) David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-07-18  0:00             ` Elimination of "use" clauses Dale Stanbrough
1999-07-20  0:00               ` Richard D Riehle
1999-07-19  0:00                 ` Brian Rogoff
1999-07-20  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-20  0:00                     ` Brian Rogoff
1999-07-21  0:00                       ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-21  0:00                         ` Robert A Duff
1999-07-21  0:00                         ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-21  0:00                       ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-21  0:00                         ` Brian Rogoff
1999-07-22  0:00                           ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-22  0:00                             ` Brian Rogoff
1999-07-22  0:00                           ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-22  0:00                             ` Brian Rogoff
1999-07-21  0:00                     ` Robert A Duff
1999-07-21  0:00                       ` Michael F. Yoder
1999-07-21  0:00                         ` Robert A Duff
1999-07-23  0:00                 ` Tucker Taft
1999-08-03  0:00                   ` Richard D Riehle
1999-07-20  0:00               ` David Kristola
1999-07-19  0:00             ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-19  0:00               ` Tucker Taft
1999-07-19  0:00                 ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-02  0:00     ` Ed Falis
1999-07-02  0:00   ` Ed Falis
1999-07-03  0:00     ` Joe Wisniewski
1999-07-03  0:00       ` Keith Thompson
1999-07-03  0:00       ` Ed Falis
1999-07-13  0:00     ` Peter Amey
1999-07-02  0:00   ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-07-02  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
     [not found]       ` <7ltl2q$mog$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
1999-07-08  0:00         ` Michael F. Yoder
1999-07-09  0:00           ` Richard D Riehle
1999-07-09  0:00             ` Michael F. Yoder
1999-07-09  0:00             ` Marin David Condic
1999-07-09  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-09  0:00             ` Michael F. Yoder
1999-07-14  0:00               ` Tucker Taft
1999-07-09  0:00             ` Dale Stanbrough
1999-07-12  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-12  0:00                 ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-10  0:00             ` Simon Wright
1999-07-12  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-08  0:00       ` R. Tim Coslet
1999-07-09  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-09  0:00           ` tmoran
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox