From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Mission-Critical Design: Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation vs Garbage Collection
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:52:47 +0100
Date: 2014-07-24T07:52:47+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lyy4vjqmdc.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bbm0t99q4f6clifuep1odu18spjjkoaqfs@4ax.com
Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> writes:
> heavy time&money investment to certify that the binaries [...] have
> not changed
I was approached by an ex-colleague to help him understand why builds of
the same source code with the same compiler (GNAT 3.16a1, Windows x
VxWorks) didn't always produce the same executable. I couldn't (not at a
distance, anyway).
That's the sort of circumstance in which one really regrets not keeping
the support contract up!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 6:17 Mission-Critical Design: Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation vs Garbage Collection NiGHTS
2014-07-18 6:25 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-07-18 7:51 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-07-19 9:07 ` Pascal Obry
2014-07-18 12:41 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-07-23 22:07 ` Robert A Duff
2014-07-24 1:00 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-07-24 6:52 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox