From: "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: Mission-Critical Design: Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation vs Garbage Collection
Date: Fri, 18 Jul 2014 09:51:29 +0200
Date: 2014-07-18T09:51:29+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lqajm1$gmr$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lqaekh$l79$1@dont-email.me>
Le 18/07/2014 08:25, Jeffrey Carter a écrit :
> On 07/17/2014 11:17 PM, NiGHTS wrote:
>> What are your thoughts on this? When is it better to use garbage
>> collection and when is it better to use classic new & delete memory
>> management when a life may be on the line?
>
> Typically, safety-critical systems don't allow dynamic allocation
> and deallocation.
>
... especially in Ada, where MUCH can be accomplished without resorting
to pointers, unlike many other languages.
--
J-P. Rosen
Adalog
2 rue du Docteur Lombard, 92441 Issy-les-Moulineaux CEDEX
Tel: +33 1 45 29 21 52, Fax: +33 1 45 29 25 00
http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 7:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 6:17 Mission-Critical Design: Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation vs Garbage Collection NiGHTS
2014-07-18 6:25 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-07-18 7:51 ` J-P. Rosen [this message]
2014-07-19 9:07 ` Pascal Obry
2014-07-18 12:41 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-07-23 22:07 ` Robert A Duff
2014-07-24 1:00 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-07-24 6:52 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox