From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Mission-Critical Design: Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation vs Garbage Collection
Date: Thu, 17 Jul 2014 23:25:21 -0700
Date: 2014-07-17T23:25:21-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <lqaekh$l79$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <de300b26-804d-4c9a-8aea-e840160b735d@googlegroups.com>
On 07/17/2014 11:17 PM, NiGHTS wrote:
> In mission-critical design applications, do they favor garbage collectors or
> the unchecked deallocation?
>
> What are your thoughts on this? When is it better to use garbage collection
> and when is it better to use classic new & delete memory management when a
> life may be on the line?
Typically, safety-critical systems don't allow dynamic allocation and deallocation.
--
Jeff Carter
"You a big nose have it."
Never Give a Sucker an Even Break
107
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-18 6:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-18 6:17 Mission-Critical Design: Ada.Unchecked_Deallocation vs Garbage Collection NiGHTS
2014-07-18 6:25 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2014-07-18 7:51 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-07-19 9:07 ` Pascal Obry
2014-07-18 12:41 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-07-23 22:07 ` Robert A Duff
2014-07-24 1:00 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-07-24 6:52 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox