1. Re: Unifont static compiled and stack size...
- by Micah Waddoups @ 2023-08-14 15:10 UTC [1%]
2. Re: Ada interface to Excel file
- by Gautier write-only address @ 2023-04-20 19:08 UTC [1%]
3. Re: Unchecked_Deallocation with tagged types
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2022-04-16 8:09 UTC [0%]
4. Re: Unchecked_Deallocation with tagged types
- by Thomas @ 2022-04-16 3:44 UTC [2%]
5. Re: array from static predicate on enumerated type
- by Shark8 @ 2021-03-17 15:08 UTC [1%]
6. Re: converting pointer to value
- by Shark8 @ 2021-03-04 16:55 UTC [3%]
7. Re: Record initialisation question
- by DrPi @ 2021-01-16 10:28 UTC [0%]
8. Re: Record initialisation question
- by Shark8 @ 2021-01-15 18:15 UTC [3%]
9. Re: Record initialisation question
- by DrPi @ 2021-01-15 7:50 UTC [0%]
10. Re: Record initialisation question
- by Shark8 @ 2021-01-14 16:53 UTC [2%]
11. Re: How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary?
- by yhumina stir @ 2020-09-28 11:36 UTC [0%]
12. Re: How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary?
- by erchetan33 @ 2020-09-19 14:08 UTC [0%]
13. Re: How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary?
- by patelchetan1111992 @ 2020-09-13 13:36 UTC [0%]
14. Re: How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary?
- by c+ @ 2020-09-03 10:32 UTC [0%]
15. How can I get this data into the .data section of the binary?
- by Luke A. Guest @ 2020-06-16 11:31 UTC [1%]
16. Re: Array Index: substitute integer with enumeration
- by Shark8 @ 2020-06-09 17:25 UTC [2%]
17. Re: Put the access value
- by briot.emmanuel @ 2020-04-15 7:20 UTC [2%]
18. Re: GNATCOLL-Mmap example
- by Bob Goddard @ 2020-01-28 18:53 UTC [2%]
19. Re: Creating several types from a base type and conversion
- by Simon Wright @ 2020-01-24 15:54 UTC [2%]
20. Re: Creating several types from a base type and conversion
- by Optikos @ 2020-01-18 14:17 UTC [0%]
21. Re: Creating several types from a base type and conversion
- by Ken Roberts @ 2020-01-18 12:49 UTC [0%]
22. Re: Creating several types from a base type and conversion
- by Simon Wright @ 2020-01-18 12:16 UTC [2%]
23. Is this actually possible?
- by Lucretia @ 2019-12-11 16:43 UTC [2%]
24. Re: Ada x <whatever> Datagram Sockets
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2019-02-08 21:38 UTC [0%]
25. Re: Ada x <whatever> Datagram Sockets
- by Rego, P. @ 2019-02-08 20:35 UTC [2%]
26. Re: Problem with Position of the enumeration Type
- by AdaMagica @ 2019-01-24 8:06 UTC [0%]
27. Re: Problem with Position of the enumeration Type
- by Luis Ladron de Guevara Moreno @ 2019-01-23 12:08 UTC [2%]
28. Re: Examining individual bytes of an integer
- by Niklas Holsti @ 2018-10-14 21:28 UTC [0%]
29. Re: Examining individual bytes of an integer
- by Niklas Holsti @ 2018-10-14 21:04 UTC [0%]
30. Re: Examining individual bytes of an integer
- by Jeffrey R. Carter @ 2018-10-14 19:55 UTC [0%]
31. Examining individual bytes of an integer
- by Henrik Härkönen @ 2018-10-14 19:15 UTC [3%]
32. Re: file descriptor of a serial port
- by jan.de.kruyf @ 2018-08-20 15:41 UTC [2%]
33. Re: Simple hash or pseudo-random function
- by gautier_niouzes @ 2018-07-18 13:38 UTC [0%]
34. Re: Simple hash or pseudo-random function
- by Jeffrey R. Carter @ 2018-07-17 6:09 UTC [2%]
35. Re: Strange crash on custom iterator
- by Simon Wright @ 2018-07-02 19:42 UTC [1%]
36. Re: AI12-0218: What is the portable representation clause for processing IETF packets on little-endian machines?
- by Jeffrey R. Carter @ 2018-05-12 7:53 UTC [0%]
37. Re: AI12-0218: What is the portable representation clause for processing IETF packets on little-endian machines?
- by Simon Wright @ 2018-05-12 7:08 UTC [2%]
38. Re: AI12-0218: What is the portable representation clause for processing IETF packets on little-endian machines?
- by Simon Wright @ 2018-05-11 7:55 UTC [2%]
39. Re: Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by David Thompson @ 2017-10-29 14:50 UTC [0%]
40. Re: Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2017-10-12 7:57 UTC [0%]
41. Re: Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-10-12 1:01 UTC [1%]
42. Re: Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-10-11 23:12 UTC [3%]
43. Re: Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-10-11 23:03 UTC [0%]
44. Re: Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-10-11 22:58 UTC [3%]
45. Re: Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by Randy Brukardt @ 2017-10-11 22:32 UTC [0%]
46. Convert between C "void*" pointer and an access
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-10-11 21:52 UTC [2%]
47. Re: use Ada.Text_IO in main() or Package?
- by gautier_niouzes @ 2017-09-14 9:49 UTC [2%]
48. Re: win32 interfacing check (SetClipboardData)
- by Randy Brukardt @ 2017-08-31 1:41 UTC [2%]
49. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-07-04 23:39 UTC [0%]
50. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Simon Wright @ 2017-07-04 21:41 UTC [0%]
51. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-07-04 20:11 UTC [0%]
52. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Niklas Holsti @ 2017-07-04 19:29 UTC [0%]
53. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-07-04 18:30 UTC [0%]
54. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Niklas Holsti @ 2017-07-04 18:15 UTC [0%]
55. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-07-04 18:06 UTC [0%]
56. Re: Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-07-04 17:50 UTC [0%]
57. Strict aliasing, is it OK?
- by Victor Porton @ 2017-07-04 17:49 UTC [2%]
58. Re: Mixing Ada code with similar licenses
- by Jere @ 2017-03-26 20:57 UTC [0%]
59. Re: Bug in Ada - Latin 1 is not a subset of UTF-8
- by G.B. @ 2016-10-21 12:28 UTC [1%]
60. GNAVI,GWindows.Common_Controls.On_Notify - how to return value?
- by George J @ 2016-08-13 9:27 UTC [1%]
61. Re: Generic formals and Aspects
- by olivermkellogg @ 2016-07-19 18:00 UTC [3%]
62. Did I find mamory leak in Generic Image Decoder (GID) ?
- by reinkor @ 2015-02-02 5:50 UTC [1%]
63. Re: Can't compile FOSDEM 2014 Ada Task Pools demo on Debian jessie
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2015-01-19 20:44 UTC [14%]
64. Debugging Audio Issue using Windows 7?
- by dd24fan @ 2014-10-02 13:56 UTC [3%]
65. Interfacing enums with C
- by Victor Porton @ 2014-08-17 19:02 UTC [2%]
66. Re: Rough proposal to make some generic types static
- by Victor Porton @ 2014-07-21 20:54 UTC [0%]
67. Rough proposal to make some generic types static
- by Victor Porton @ 2014-07-21 20:44 UTC [3%]
68. Re: 'Size hack for enumerated types
- by Victor Porton @ 2014-07-06 16:25 UTC [0%]
69. Re: 'Size hack for enumerated types
- by Victor Porton @ 2014-07-05 22:23 UTC [0%]
70. Re: 'Size hack for enumerated types
- by Victor Porton @ 2014-07-05 22:18 UTC [3%]
71. Re: GNAT 4.8 atomic access to 64-bit objects
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2013-11-16 12:02 UTC [0%]
72. Re: GNAT 4.8 atomic access to 64-bit objects
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2013-11-16 10:08 UTC [0%]
73. Re: GNAT 4.8 atomic access to 64-bit objects
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2013-11-15 21:33 UTC [3%]
74. Re: GNAT Allocation of a very large record
- by Per Sandberg @ 2013-08-14 19:32 UTC [0%]
75. GNAT Allocation of a very large record
- by hyunghwan.chung @ 2013-08-14 3:50 UTC [2%]
76. Generic access type convention and aliasing
- by Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) @ 2013-05-06 0:20 UTC [1%]
77. Re: GNAT not generating any code for sub‑program: known bug?
- by Simon Wright @ 2013-04-28 7:14 UTC [2%]
78. Re: Tasking troubles, unexpected termination.
- by Shark8 @ 2012-10-31 2:17 UTC [1%]
79. Re: ANN: AdaTutor on the Web - done
- by AdaMagica @ 2012-09-29 10:22 UTC [3%]
80. Re: Endianness and Record Specification
- by Simon Wright @ 2012-09-21 22:18 UTC [3%]
81. Re: Ada.Locales pseudo-string types
- by Jeffrey R. Carter @ 2012-08-07 5:57 UTC [3%]
82. Re: Ada.Locales pseudo-string types
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2012-08-07 15:46 UTC [0%]
83. Re: GNAT (GCC) Profile Guided Compilation
- by Keean Schupke @ 2012-07-18 17:36 UTC [0%]
84. Re: GNAT (GCC) Profile Guided Compilation
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2012-07-18 10:01 UTC [2%]
85. Re: condition true or false? -> (-1 < sizeof("test"))
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2012-05-22 10:29 UTC [2%]
86. Re: Dispatching callback handed over to C
- by Randy Brukardt @ 2012-04-05 21:06 UTC [0%]
87. Re: Dispatching callback handed over to C
- by Natasha Kerensikova @ 2012-04-05 9:13 UTC [2%]
88. Re: xor
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2012-03-28 21:48 UTC [1%]
89. Re: Any leap year issues caused by Ada yesterday?
- by Simon Wright @ 2012-03-06 17:59 UTC [2%]
90. Re: Representation clauses for base-64 encoding
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2011-12-22 22:18 UTC [2%]
91. Re: Representation clauses for base-64 encoding
- by Niklas Holsti @ 2011-12-22 11:20 UTC [0%]
92. Representation clauses for base-64 encoding
- by Natasha Kerensikova @ 2011-12-22 9:41 UTC [2%]
93. Re: Does Ada support endiannes?
- by Simon Wright @ 2011-12-15 13:01 UTC [2%]
94. Re: Interfaces.Shift_Left
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2011-12-13 1:36 UTC [0%]
95. Re: Interfaces.Shift_Left
- by Simon Wright @ 2011-12-12 23:34 UTC [2%]
96. Re: Does Ada support endiannes?
- by Jeffrey Carter @ 2011-12-12 19:23 UTC [3%]
97. Re: Stream_Element_Array
- by anon @ 2011-09-16 11:17 UTC [3%]
98. Re: Stream_Element_Array
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2011-09-14 9:40 UTC [0%]
99. Re: Stream_Element_Array
- by Alexander Korolev @ 2011-09-14 9:09 UTC [0%]
100. Re: Stream_Element_Array
- by Simon Wright @ 2011-09-14 8:31 UTC [2%]
101. Re: acceess problem
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2011-07-26 17:43 UTC [0%]
102. Re: acceess problem
- by Gautier write-only @ 2011-07-26 15:57 UTC [2%]
103. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by anon @ 2011-05-14 23:47 UTC [0%]
104. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by anon @ 2011-05-13 0:47 UTC [0%]
105. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by AdaMagica @ 2011-05-12 5:51 UTC [3%]
106. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by Randy Brukardt @ 2011-05-12 0:51 UTC [0%]
107. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by anon @ 2011-05-11 20:39 UTC [3%]
108. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by anon @ 2011-05-08 20:24 UTC [3%]
109. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by Florian Weimer @ 2011-04-30 16:16 UTC [0%]
110. Re: A hole in Ada type safety
- by Robert A Duff @ 2011-04-30 11:56 UTC [0%]
111. A hole in Ada type safety
- by Florian Weimer @ 2011-04-30 8:41 UTC [3%]
112. Re: Fun with C
- by George P. @ 2011-04-17 18:19 UTC [0%]
113. Re: Fun with C
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2011-04-17 8:40 UTC [2%]
114. Re: Fun with C
- by Martin @ 2011-04-17 8:29 UTC [0%]
115. Re: Fun with C
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2011-04-17 7:17 UTC [3%]
116. Re: GNAT.Serial_Communications
- by tonyg @ 2011-04-16 10:21 UTC [0%]
117. Re: GNAT.Serial_Communications
- by Jeffrey Carter @ 2011-04-15 18:01 UTC [3%]
118. Re: Help with low level Ada
- by Syntax Issues @ 2011-03-17 19:30 UTC [0%]
119. Re: Help with low level Ada
- by Jeffrey Carter @ 2011-03-17 17:55 UTC [2%]
120. Re: Adress => Access: types for unchecked conversion have different sizes
- by Randy Brukardt @ 2011-03-13 3:32 UTC [0%]
121. Re: Adress => Access: types for unchecked conversion have different sizes
- by Edward Fish @ 2011-03-12 17:00 UTC [0%]
122. Adress => Access: types for unchecked conversion have different sizes
- by Martin Krischik @ 2011-03-12 15:08 UTC [2%]
123. Re: bit numbers in packed arrays of Boolean
- by Niklas Holsti @ 2010-08-31 12:34 UTC [0%]
124. bit numbers in packed arrays of Boolean
- by Stephen Leake @ 2010-08-31 11:14 UTC [2%]
125. Re: S-expression I/O in Ada
- by Jeffrey Carter @ 2010-08-17 19:00 UTC [2%]
126. Re: What is the best way to convert Integer to Short_Short_Integer?
- by Adrian Hoe @ 2010-06-11 2:21 UTC [0%]
127. What is the best way to convert Integer to Short_Short_Integer?
- by Adrian Hoe @ 2010-06-11 1:17 UTC [3%]
128. Re: How to access this package written in C?
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2010-04-23 14:15 UTC [0%]
129. Re: How to access this package written in C?
- by resander @ 2010-04-23 12:58 UTC [1%]
130. Re: Having a problem building with win32ada
- by John McCabe @ 2010-03-09 21:37 UTC [0%]
131. Re: Having a problem building with win32ada
- by John McCabe @ 2010-03-09 21:00 UTC [2%]
132. Re: Tricks Of The Trade: How To Compile Large Program On Two Very Different Compilers
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2009-11-05 18:21 UTC [2%]
133. Re: Performance of the Streams 'Read and 'Write
- by Gautier write-only @ 2009-11-02 22:19 UTC [3%]
134. Re: Gem 39 - compiler specific?
- by Randy Brukardt @ 2009-09-02 23:20 UTC [2%]
135. Re: Q: Line_IO
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2009-08-31 23:56 UTC [2%]
136. Re: Q: Line_IO
- by Martin @ 2009-08-31 8:28 UTC [0%]
137. Re: Generalized serialization for enumeration types
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2009-08-26 11:17 UTC [2%]
138. Error: "could not understand bounds information on packed array"
- by Dennis Hoppe @ 2009-05-29 0:55 UTC [2%]
139. Re: Conversion from floating point to signed 16 bits
- by Olivier Scalbert @ 2009-05-19 22:08 UTC [0%]
140. Re: Conversion from floating point to signed 16 bits
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2009-05-19 20:06 UTC [2%]
141. Re: (Num_Types.Mod_4 range 1..8) ------->why not (1..8)?
- by christoph.grein @ 2009-05-19 8:04 UTC [0%]
142. Re: (Num_Types.Mod_4 range 1..8) ------->why not (1..8)?
- by Petter @ 2009-05-19 7:47 UTC [3%]
143. Re: (Num_Types.Mod_4 range 1..8) ------->why not (1..8)?
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2009-05-18 21:24 UTC [0%]
144. Re: (Num_Types.Mod_4 range 1..8) ------->why not (1..8)?
- by convergence82 @ 2009-05-18 21:12 UTC [0%]
145. Re: (Num_Types.Mod_4 range 1..8) ------->why not (1..8)?
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2009-05-18 20:53 UTC [0%]
146. Re: (Num_Types.Mod_4 range 1..8) ------->why not (1..8)?
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2009-05-18 20:50 UTC [0%]
147. Re: (Num_Types.Mod_4 range 1..8) ------->why not (1..8)?
- by convergence82 @ 2009-05-18 19:58 UTC [2%]
148. Re: GNAT on WinXP: System.OS_Lib.Spawn raises Program_Error
- by Ed Falis @ 2009-05-04 1:21 UTC [0%]
149. Re: GNAT on WinXP: System.OS_Lib.Spawn raises Program_Error
- by anon @ 2009-05-04 0:22 UTC [2%]
150. GNAT.Sockets writing data to nowhere...
- by xorquewasp @ 2009-03-01 1:32 UTC [2%]
151. Exceptions (was Re: How do I go about creating a minimal GNAT runtime?)
- by anon @ 2009-02-10 2:34 UTC [1%]
152. Re: cannot generate code for file a-excach.adb (subunit)
- by xavier grave @ 2009-01-27 14:38 UTC [0%]
153. cannot generate code for file a-excach.adb (subunit)
- by Lucretia @ 2009-01-27 14:21 UTC [2%]
154. Re: Restarting Tread: Why isn't this program working with Unchecked_Converstion
- by Martin @ 2009-01-16 16:23 UTC [3%]
155. Re: Restarting Tread: Why isn't this program working with Unchecked_Converstion
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2009-01-16 15:11 UTC [2%]
156. Re: How to put 200.0 (is float variable of 32 bits) into an integer sub-type of 10 bits (complete program included)
- by Steve D @ 2009-01-16 3:17 UTC [3%]
157. Re: Restarting Tread: Why isn't this program working with
- by anon @ 2009-01-16 1:37 UTC [3%]
158. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by Stuart @ 2009-01-15 12:40 UTC [2%]
159. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2009-01-15 10:29 UTC [2%]
160. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by Martin @ 2009-01-15 8:57 UTC [0%]
161. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by Michael Bode @ 2009-01-15 6:53 UTC [3%]
162. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by sjw @ 2009-01-14 21:32 UTC [0%]
163. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by sjw @ 2009-01-14 21:17 UTC [0%]
164. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2009-01-14 16:08 UTC [3%]
165. Re: How to put 200 into an integer sub-type of 16 bits (code included)
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2009-01-14 9:06 UTC [2%]
166. Re: Making a Inet_Addr_Type out of octects (GNAT.Sockets)
- by anon @ 2008-10-08 10:28 UTC [2%]
167. Re: Warning when compiling s-interr.adb runtime file with -gnatc
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2008-09-26 0:47 UTC [0%]
168. Warning when compiling s-interr.adb runtime file with -gnatc
- by David Sauvage @ 2008-09-25 22:17 UTC [2%]
169. Re: Structure of the multitasking server
- by anon @ 2008-09-23 9:25 UTC [1%]
170. Re: Adding offset to 'Address
- by Kim Rostgaard Christensen @ 2008-09-17 9:15 UTC [0%]
171. Re: Adding offset to 'Address
- by tmoran @ 2008-09-13 6:21 UTC [3%]
172. Re: Controlling endian-ness?
- by Steve @ 2008-08-05 3:10 UTC [2%]
173. Re: Bit operations in Ada (endianness)
- by Dennis Hoppe @ 2008-06-02 13:27 UTC [0%]
174. Re: Bit operations in Ada
- by Simon Wright @ 2008-05-24 15:36 UTC [0%]
175. Re: Bit operations in Ada (Thank you)
- by Dennis Hoppe @ 2008-05-24 9:40 UTC [2%]
176. Re: Bit operations in Ada
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2008-05-23 22:08 UTC [3%]
177. Re: How to check a Float for NaN
- by Adam Beneschan @ 2008-05-06 22:18 UTC [0%]
178. Re: How to check a Float for NaN
- by Wiljan Derks @ 2008-05-06 18:45 UTC [2%]
179. Re: updating a hardware cursor with assembly and ada
- by cl1 @ 2008-03-07 19:01 UTC [2%]
180. Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- by Samuel Tardieu @ 2008-02-25 21:47 UTC [2%]
181. Re: Is it really Ok to assert that the Ada syntax is a context-free grammar ?
- by Robert A Duff @ 2008-02-20 20:51 UTC [2%]
182. Re: Real Time IO routines
- by anon @ 2007-10-27 20:15 UTC [0%]
183. Re: Real Time IO routines
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2007-10-27 10:18 UTC [0%]
184. Re: Real Time IO routines
- by anon @ 2007-10-27 8:56 UTC [3%]
185. Re: Real Time IO routines
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2007-10-26 20:29 UTC [2%]
186. Re: Base64-Encoding
- by anon @ 2007-10-19 19:40 UTC [2%]
187. Re: Base64-Encoding
- by Stefan Bellon @ 2007-10-19 6:59 UTC [0%]
188. Re: Base64-Encoding
- by anon @ 2007-10-19 4:33 UTC [0%]
189. Re: Base64-Encoding
- by anon @ 2007-10-19 2:43 UTC [3%]
190. Re: urgent question - generics
- by anon @ 2007-09-04 0:38 UTC [2%]
191. Re: Byte streams
- by Jeffrey R. Carter @ 2007-08-03 5:34 UTC [2%]
192. Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2007-07-10 8:30 UTC [0%]
193. Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- by Randy Brukardt @ 2007-07-10 1:35 UTC [0%]
194. Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2007-07-09 21:31 UTC [0%]
195. Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- by Y.Tomino @ 2007-07-09 13:31 UTC [2%]
196. Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- by Martin Krischik @ 2007-07-08 16:08 UTC [0%]
197. Re: Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- by Georg Bauhaus @ 2007-07-08 9:49 UTC [0%]
198. Pure, Storage_Size and Unchecked_Conversion
- by Y.Tomino @ 2007-07-08 0:24 UTC [3%]
199. Re: String literals and wide_string literals - how?
- by Robert A Duff @ 2007-04-22 1:00 UTC [0%]
200. Re: String literals and wide_string literals - how?
- by Simon Wright @ 2007-04-21 9:41 UTC [0%]
Results 1-200 of ~500 next (older) | reverse | options above
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox