Re: Ada-Oriented GUI

["Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net>]

On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 12:34:04 PM UTC-5, Alejandro R. Mosteo wrote:
> On 21/03/18 14:58, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> > On Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 4:49:39 AM UTC-5, Alejandro R. Mosteo wrote:
> >> On 19/03/18 15:10, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> >>> I will need to take a portion of that back; there was some initial attempt at an RxAda that was reported last year:
> >>>
> >>> https://www.auto.tuwien.ac.at/~blieb/AE2017/presentations/RxAdaSlidesShort.pdf
> >>>
> >>> Perhaps this initial foray into an RxAda by Alejandro Mosteo is a starting point, or at least a prior reference to critique.
> >>
> >> RxAda is right now somewhat down in my stack of priorities, but actually
> >> a demo over GtkAda/Gnoga is among the things I want to attempt sooner or
> >> later.
> >>
> >> Álex.
> > 
> > I was hoping that you would reply to this thread.  Thank you, for the reply and for all your valuable & appreciated work on RxAda.  (Comp.lang.ada is more exciting when principle people contribute their expertise regarding fresh trends in Ada, rather than merely students seeking to cheat on their homework/test questions.) Is RxAda released publicly?  If not yet, might RxAda be released publicly as part of that GtkAda/Gnoga demonstration?
> 
> Thanks for these kind words. Sure, the repository is public: 
> https://bitbucket.org/amosteo/rxada

Thank you so much!

> There are some thoughts about my experience writing RxAda in the website 
> above

Over there you mention that a design goal of RxAda was to avoid RxCpp's cryptosyntax.  What specifically was the origin of that RxCpp cryptosyntax?  Something in RxCpp itself?  Or C++11/C++14/C++17's lambda's cryptosyntax in general?

(I had a nightmare one time where the ISO14889 C++ standards body started to utilize APL symbols to take the cryptosyntax to a whole new level.)