From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 2002:a24:2e10:: with SMTP id i16-v6mr4061244ita.36.1521741012088; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:50:12 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 2002:a9d:29d2:: with SMTP id g18-v6mr1503675otd.5.1521741011661; Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:50:11 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!news.roellig-ltd.de!open-news-network.org!peer03.am4!peer.am4.highwinds-media.com!peer02.iad!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!border1.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca1.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!199-v6no988004itl.0!news-out.google.com!d3-v6ni1240itf.0!nntp.google.com!u184-v6no988386ita.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 10:50:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=47.185.233.194; posting-account=zwxLlwoAAAChLBU7oraRzNDnqQYkYbpo NNTP-Posting-Host: 47.185.233.194 References: <7789c58e-ca36-44a2-8818-009eface4a3e@googlegroups.com> <926b83eb-6cce-417d-9c17-df6be2bc98d5@googlegroups.com> <2d1f392f-e747-42aa-8938-d6538d5b9934@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <35fae0b6-53f7-49ac-a2b3-48c5d9fa823c@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Ada-Oriented GUI From: "Dan'l Miller" Injection-Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:50:12 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Received-Bytes: 3360 X-Received-Body-CRC: 1023555114 Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:51140 Date: 2018-03-22T10:50:11-07:00 List-Id: On Thursday, March 22, 2018 at 12:34:04 PM UTC-5, Alejandro R. Mosteo wrote= : > On 21/03/18 14:58, Dan'l Miller wrote: > > On Wednesday, March 21, 2018 at 4:49:39 AM UTC-5, Alejandro R. Mosteo w= rote: > >> On 19/03/18 15:10, Dan'l Miller wrote: > >>> I will need to take a portion of that back; there was some initial at= tempt at an RxAda that was reported last year: > >>> > >>> https://www.auto.tuwien.ac.at/~blieb/AE2017/presentations/RxAdaSlides= Short.pdf > >>> > >>> Perhaps this initial foray into an RxAda by Alejandro Mosteo is a sta= rting point, or at least a prior reference to critique. > >> > >> RxAda is right now somewhat down in my stack of priorities, but actual= ly > >> a demo over GtkAda/Gnoga is among the things I want to attempt sooner = or > >> later. > >> > >> =C3=81lex. > >=20 > > I was hoping that you would reply to this thread. Thank you, for the r= eply and for all your valuable & appreciated work on RxAda. (Comp.lang.ada= is more exciting when principle people contribute their expertise regardin= g fresh trends in Ada, rather than merely students seeking to cheat on thei= r homework/test questions.) Is RxAda released publicly? If not yet, might = RxAda be released publicly as part of that GtkAda/Gnoga demonstration? >=20 > Thanks for these kind words. Sure, the repository is public:=20 > https://bitbucket.org/amosteo/rxada Thank you so much! > There are some thoughts about my experience writing RxAda in the website= =20 > above Over there you mention that a design goal of RxAda was to avoid RxCpp's cry= ptosyntax. What specifically was the origin of that RxCpp cryptosyntax? S= omething in RxCpp itself? Or C++11/C++14/C++17's lambda's cryptosyntax in = general? (I had a nightmare one time where the ISO14889 C++ standards body started t= o utilize APL symbols to take the cryptosyntax to a whole new level.)