From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Subject: Re: Hash table
Date: 15 Aug 2005 08:47:39 -0700
Date: 2005-08-15T08:47:39-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124120859.768505.108320@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ddpe29$s8h$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
Martin Dowie wrote:
> > Matt and I don't agree on exactly what to use if you want to use
> > something that will be like the Ada200Y API - he like generics as
> > you can use them in an Ada200Y fashion, I think that if you are
> > using Ada95 an Ada95 access type fashion is good enough (is this
> > accurate Matt?).
No, the named access type approach is *not* good enough, because it's
impossible to use a locally-declared subprogram (the only thing that
makes any sense) as the iterator parameter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-15 15:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-13 0:43 Hash table David Trudgett
2005-08-13 9:23 ` Frank
2005-08-13 13:52 ` Ludovic Brenta
2005-08-14 0:23 ` David Trudgett
2005-08-14 22:42 ` Martin Dowie
2005-08-15 6:51 ` Martin Dowie
2005-08-15 15:47 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
2005-08-16 7:33 ` Martin Dowie
2005-08-13 23:58 ` Matthew Heaney
2005-08-14 1:30 ` David Trudgett
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox