From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,41e60d168b455460
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Matthew Heaney" <mheaney@on2.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Hash table
Date: 15 Aug 2005 08:47:39 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Message-ID: <1124120859.768505.108320@g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
References: <m3k6iq4qfq.fsf@rr.trudgett><874q9uuepj.fsf@tiscali.be>
   <m3d5oh8iyo.fsf@rr.trudgett>
   <ddohdf$6t1$1@nwrdmz03.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
   <ddpe29$s8h$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 66.162.65.162
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1124120865 24029 127.0.0.1 (15 Aug 2005 15:47:45
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 15:47:45 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <ddpe29$s8h$1@nwrdmz02.dmz.ncs.ea.ibs-infra.bt.com>
User-Agent: G2/0.2
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: g49g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=66.162.65.162;
   posting-account=Zl1UPAwAAADEsUSm1PMMiDjihtBlZUi_
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4124
Date: 2005-08-15T08:47:39-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


Martin Dowie wrote:
> > Matt and I don't agree on exactly what to use if you want to use
> > something that will be like the Ada200Y API - he like generics as
> > you can use them in an Ada200Y fashion, I think that if you are
> > using Ada95 an Ada95 access type fashion is good enough (is this
> > accurate Matt?).

No, the named access type approach is *not* good enough, because it's
impossible to use a locally-declared subprogram (the only thing that
makes any sense) as the iterator parameter.