1. Re: Using pointers with inline assembly in Ada
- by NiGHTS @ 2022-06-11 12:32 UTC [0%]
2. Re: Using pointers with inline assembly in Ada
- by Simon Wright @ 2022-06-11 12:28 UTC [6%]
3. Re: GNAT for AVR - Mathematical Functions
- by Aurele Vitali @ 2018-09-17 22:41 UTC [6%]
4. Re: GNAT for AVR - Mathematical Functions
- by Aurele Vitali @ 2018-09-17 22:35 UTC [6%]
5. Re: Using System.Machine_Code in GPL 2017 Zfp for Arm
- by ahlan @ 2017-11-13 13:21 UTC [8%]
6. Re: Using System.Machine_Code in GPL 2017 Zfp for Arm
- by Simon Wright @ 2017-11-13 11:40 UTC [8%]
7. Re: Using System.Machine_Code in GPL 2017 Zfp for Arm
- by ahlan @ 2017-11-13 10:57 UTC [14%]
8. Using System.Machine_Code in GPL 2017 Zfp for Arm
- by ahlan @ 2017-11-13 10:08 UTC [13%]
9. Re: Protected Objects and Interrupt Handlers
- by Simon Wright @ 2016-03-13 8:10 UTC [0%]
10. Re: Protected Objects and Interrupt Handlers
- by Simon Wright @ 2016-02-25 19:49 UTC [5%]
11. Re: ANN: gcc 4.9.1bis for Darwin
- by Vincent @ 2015-02-24 21:53 UTC [0%]
12. Re: ANN: gcc 4.9.1bis for Darwin
- by Simon Wright @ 2015-02-21 12:10 UTC [5%]
13. Re: C versus Ada (once again :-)), was: Re: F-22 ADA Programming
- by Florian Weimer @ 2014-11-04 13:42 UTC [0%]
14. Re: C versus Ada (once again :-)), was: Re: F-22 ADA Programming
- by Dmitry A. Kazakov @ 2014-11-03 22:28 UTC [0%]
15. Re: C versus Ada (once again :-)), was: Re: F-22 ADA Programming
- by Shark8 @ 2014-11-03 21:58 UTC [5%]
16. Re: GLIBC_2.14 memcpy
- by anon @ 2014-04-28 12:23 UTC [6%]
17. Interrupt-driven Usart not working in Ada, but in C working, why?
- by Rego, P. @ 2014-03-16 20:37 UTC [5%]
18. Slow? Ada??
- by Bill Findlay @ 2013-07-12 1:01 UTC [4%]
19. Re: Erroneous code generation from GNAT or GCC?
- by Simon Wright @ 2013-04-30 22:22 UTC [5%]
20. Erroneous code generation from GNAT or GCC?
- by Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) @ 2013-04-28 22:35 UTC [3%]
21. Re: GNAT not generating any code for sub‑program: known bug?
- by Yannick Duchêne (Hibou57) @ 2013-04-28 17:52 UTC [3%]
22. Re: GNAT not generating any code for sub‑program: known bug?
- by Simon Wright @ 2013-04-28 7:14 UTC [6%]
23. Re: Help with Inline assembly
- by theanalogmachine @ 2012-07-09 14:43 UTC [0%]
24. Re: Help with Inline assembly
- by theanalogmachine @ 2012-07-09 8:41 UTC [0%]
25. Re: Help with Inline assembly
- by anon @ 2012-07-09 6:35 UTC [0%]
26. Help with Inline assembly
- by Jim C. @ 2012-07-09 3:53 UTC [5%]
27. Re: Importing C function with variable argument list
- by Markus Schöpflin @ 2012-04-13 8:04 UTC [5%]
28. Re: Any leap year issues caused by Ada yesterday?
- by Simon Wright @ 2012-03-06 17:59 UTC [4%]
29. Re: Overloading attributes
- by anon @ 2011-11-30 11:05 UTC [4%]
30. Re: strange behavior while compiling code with asm()
- by Simon Wright @ 2011-05-26 16:50 UTC [0%]
31. strange behavior while compiling code with asm()
- by milouz @ 2011-05-26 15:10 UTC [5%]
32. Re: Advice on selling Ada to a C shop
- by anon @ 2010-06-23 16:20 UTC [5%]
33. Re: Code Statement
- by AdaMagica @ 2010-05-19 10:20 UTC [0%]
34. Re: Code Statement
- by sjw @ 2010-05-19 9:56 UTC [5%]
35. Re: Code Statement
- by Simon Wright @ 2010-05-19 6:07 UTC [6%]
36. Re: Code Statement
- by anon @ 2010-05-19 4:37 UTC [7%]
37. Re: Code Statement
- by AdaMagica @ 2010-05-18 13:29 UTC [5%]
38. Re: Code Statement
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2010-05-18 13:22 UTC [5%]
39. Re: GPS and assembly language files
- by Rolf @ 2010-03-30 8:13 UTC [5%]
40. Re: Is there an Ada compiler whose Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions.Log(Base=>10, X=>variable) is efficient?
- by Colin Paul Gloster @ 2010-02-16 16:50 UTC [3%]
41. Re: Is there an Ada compiler whose Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_Functions.Log(Base=>10, X=>variable) is efficient?
- by sjw @ 2010-02-15 19:50 UTC [5%]
42. Re: Learning Ada
- by anon @ 2009-07-09 22:28 UTC [5%]
43. Re: How to exit an Ada program with (unix shell) error code?
- by anon @ 2009-05-08 10:17 UTC [5%]
44. Re: GNAT on WinXP: System.OS_Lib.Spawn raises Program_Error
- by Martin @ 2009-05-03 9:42 UTC [0%]
45. Re: GNAT on WinXP: System.OS_Lib.Spawn raises Program_Error
- by anon @ 2009-05-02 20:39 UTC [5%]
46. Re: Yes it is possible. Re: Stackusage at runtime
- by anon @ 2008-11-05 21:55 UTC [4%]
47. Re: updating a hardware cursor with assembly and ada
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2008-03-07 20:16 UTC [7%]
48. Re: updating a hardware cursor with assembly and ada
- by cl1 @ 2008-03-07 19:01 UTC [7%]
49. Re: Ada and SIMD
- by anon @ 2007-09-19 5:24 UTC [0%]
50. Re: Ada and SIMD
- by Adrian Hoe @ 2007-09-19 3:26 UTC [0%]
51. Re: Ada and SIMD
- by anon @ 2007-09-18 10:22 UTC [5%]
52. Re: real_time.clock is not monotonic
- by Simon Wright @ 2007-02-21 20:17 UTC [6%]
53. call procedure in Linux-Ada-module from "normal" program
- by Frank @ 2006-08-24 16:33 UTC [6%]
54. Re: asm()
- by Jean-Baptiste CAMPESATO @ 2005-03-22 7:41 UTC [0%]
55. Re: asm()
- by Ludovic Brenta @ 2005-03-21 23:13 UTC [5%]
56. Re: Bitmanipulation in Ada
- by Francois G. Dorais @ 2004-08-19 21:24 UTC [3%]
57. Inline ASM
- by Dan McLeran @ 2004-05-18 17:13 UTC [6%]
58. Re: Pass by reference
- by Simon Wright @ 2004-04-17 7:59 UTC [0%]
59. Re: Pass by reference
- by Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler @ 2004-04-15 9:43 UTC [3%]
60. Re: Pass by reference
- by Simon Wright @ 2004-04-14 17:27 UTC [7%]
61. Re: Little Endian -> Big Endian (Ada95 / GNAT)
- by Guillaume Foliard @ 2004-02-27 20:38 UTC [7%]
62. Hardware Interrupts
- by Carroll-Tech @ 2004-02-21 20:39 UTC [4%]
63. Re: Ada and ASM
- by Wes Groleau @ 2003-09-06 15:25 UTC [5%]
64. Re: Ada and ASM
- by Marin David Condic @ 2003-09-06 13:14 UTC [0%]
65. Re: Ada and ASM
- by Simon Wright @ 2003-09-06 7:25 UTC [4%]
66. Re: Compute a Sin(X) and Cos(X) pair, FSINCOS, inlining
- by Jerry van Dijk @ 2003-07-13 23:32 UTC [5%]
67. gnat and rounding up Long_Long_Float
- by Hans Koch @ 2001-10-16 22:27 UTC [5%]
68. Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of
- by Stanley R. Allen @ 2001-08-14 15:39 UTC [5%]
69. Re: efficient vector/matrix operations in Fortran, was Re: ... in Ada
- by Lutz Donnerhacke @ 2001-08-14 10:37 UTC [4%]
70. Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of
- by Ted Dennison @ 2001-08-09 17:24 UTC [0%]
71. Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of
- by Larry Kilgallen @ 2001-08-09 15:25 UTC [5%]
72. Re: text_io is not a predefined library
- by David C. Hoos, Sr. @ 2001-03-13 10:47 UTC [7%]
73. Re: Reading/writing LPT1
- by tmoran @ 2000-08-21 0:42 UTC [4%]
74. Re: Reading/writing LPT1
- by David Boman @ 2000-08-21 0:00 UTC [0%]
75. Re: Parallel port
- by tmoran @ 2000-03-07 0:00 UTC [5%]
76. Re: What's wrong with this simple Ada w/ assembly code?
- by robert_dewar @ 1999-03-04 0:00 UTC [5%]
77. ACT ANNOUNCES: GNAT 3.11p now available!
- by robert_dewar @ 1999-01-25 0:00 UTC [1%]
78. Re: Assembler in Ada?
- by news.oxy.com @ 1999-01-22 0:00 UTC [6%]
79. Re: GNAT system.machine_code
- by William D. Ghrist @ 1998-02-19 0:00 UTC [8%]
80. GNAT system.machine_code
- by Andy Perkins @ 1998-02-18 0:00 UTC [14%]
81. Re: Ada and assembler
- by Samuel Tardieu @ 1997-09-18 0:00 UTC [4%]
82. Re: Why couldn't an operating system be written in ada
- by Jon S Anthony @ 1996-07-16 0:00 UTC [4%]
Results 1-82 of 82 | reverse | options above
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox