Searching for HP GNAT Binaries

Searching for HP GNAT Binaries

[Warren W. Gay VE3WWG]

I have scoured the net, as much as I can, and can only
find vestiges of references to prior versions of GNAT
binaries in existance (for HP). However, I cannot seem 
to find the binaries themselves anymore.

GNAT unfortunately, requires a working version of GNAT
to be installed to compile it for the platform. If anyone
has binaries/pointers for GNAT under HPUX-10.2, I'd be
grateful.

TIA, Warren.

-- 
Warren W. Gay VE3WWG mailto:ve3wwg@home.com
http://members.home.net/ve3wwg

Re: Searching for HP GNAT Binaries

[Ted Dennison]

In article <3A819DD8.8643753E@home.com>,
  "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@home.com> wrote:
> GNAT unfortunately, requires a working version of GNAT
> to be installed to compile it for the platform. If anyone

Well, not exactly. You *could* do a cross-compile. That's more work than
I'd care to do for fun though.

--
T.E.D.

http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/

Re: Searching for HP GNAT Binaries

[Britt Snodgrass]

 gnat-3.12p-hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20-bin.tar.gz is available in 
ftp://ftp.cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/private/old/

Britt

"Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" wrote:
> 
> I have scoured the net, as much as I can, and can only
> find vestiges of references to prior versions of GNAT
> binaries in existance (for HP). However, I cannot seem
> to find the binaries themselves anymore.
> 
> GNAT unfortunately, requires a working version of GNAT
> to be installed to compile it for the platform. If anyone
> has binaries/pointers for GNAT under HPUX-10.2, I'd be
> grateful.
> 
> TIA, Warren.
> 
> --
> Warren W. Gay VE3WWG mailto:ve3wwg@home.com
> http://members.home.net/ve3wwg

Re: Searching for HP GNAT Binaries (found)

[Warren W. Gay VE3WWG]

Thanks everyone. Stefan Lindesvik <stefan.lindesvik@emw.ericsson.se>
pointed me to the following link, which was just what I was looking
for:

ftp://ftp.cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/private/old/gnat-3.12p-hppa1.1-hp-hpux10.20-bin.tar.gz

Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> In article <3A819DD8.8643753E@home.com>,
>   "Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@home.com> wrote:
> > GNAT unfortunately, requires a working version of GNAT
> > to be installed to compile it for the platform. If anyone
> 
> Well, not exactly. You *could* do a cross-compile. That's more work than
> I'd care to do for fun though.
> 
> --
> T.E.D.
> 
> http://www.telepath.com/~dennison/Ted/TED.html
> 
> Sent via Deja.com
> http://www.deja.com/

-- 
Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
http://members.home.net/ve3wwg

Re: Searching for HP GNAT Binaries

[Florian Weimer]

"Warren W. Gay VE3WWG" <ve3wwg@home.com> writes:

> I have scoured the net, as much as I can, and can only
> find vestiges of references to prior versions of GNAT
> binaries in existance (for HP). However, I cannot seem 
> to find the binaries themselves anymore.

You have to read some README file which contains the location on the
NYU FTP site (it's in a private, not ls-able directory, probably to
prevent scripts from mirroring old, obsolete stuff).

We've got a HTTP mirror of this directory :

http://de.gnuada.org/gnat/private/old/

Re: Searching for HP GNAT Binaries

[Richard Kenner]

In article <95s8fc$6s$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:
>Well, not exactly. You *could* do a cross-compile. That's more work than
>I'd care to do for fun though.

It's actually not all that much work if you are intimately familiar with
cross-compilation and the GCC build process and are doing it to a supported
GNAT target.  You can do it in 7 commands, if I'm counting right and the
machines share a file system.

However, this is very much the situation that if you know understand
the process, you don't need to be told those 7 commands and if you
don't understand what's going on, knowing those 7 commands isn't going to
be of much help since they will differ in detail depending on how you've
set up your directories.

GNAT not in gcc-3.0?

[Ronald Cole]

I'd have sworn that Robert said that GNAT was going to be in gcc-3.0, but
by the looks of the official web page, it isn't:

        <http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html>

-- 
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA  93556-1412
Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com>      Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO                             Fax: (760) 499-9152
My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084  4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B

Re: GNAT not in gcc-3.0?

[Robert Dewar]

In article <m3hf23uuid.fsf_-_@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>,
  Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> wrote:
> I'd have sworn that Robert said that GNAT was going to be in
gcc-3.0, but
> by the looks of the official web page, it isn't:
>
>         <http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html>

We are discussing now whether to put GNAT into 3.0 or wait
till just after. The issue is to work out whether there is
a risk of destabilizing the release. Richard and Mark are
working out the best approach.

Robert could hardly have specifically promised that GNAT would
go into GCC 3.0 because (a) there was no firm release schedule
at that time anyway and (b) Robert is not the GCC release
manager :-)


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/