From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,MSGID_RANDY
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95ccd347a31905c3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-09 21:20:15 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!nntp-relay.ihug.net!ihug.co.nz!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!ucberkeley!nntp2.deja.com!nnrp1.deja.com!not-for-mail
From: Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT not in gcc-3.0?
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 05:14:05 GMT
Organization: Deja.com
Message-ID: <962imr$cna$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
References: <3A819DD8.8643753E@home.com> <95s8fc$6s$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <Nc%g6.4$E04.287@typhoon.nyu.edu> <m3hf23uuid.fsf_-_@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 205.232.38.14
X-Article-Creation-Date: Sat Feb 10 05:14:05 2001 GMT
X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/4.61 [en] (OS/2; U)
X-Http-Proxy: 1.0 x51.deja.com:80 (Squid/1.1.22) for client 205.232.38.14
X-MyDeja-Info: XMYDJUIDrobert_dewar
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5090
Date: 2001-02-10T05:14:05+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

In article <m3hf23uuid.fsf_-_@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>,
  Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com> wrote:
> I'd have sworn that Robert said that GNAT was going to be in
gcc-3.0, but
> by the looks of the official web page, it isn't:
>
>         <http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html>

We are discussing now whether to put GNAT into 3.0 or wait
till just after. The issue is to work out whether there is
a risk of destabilizing the release. Richard and Mark are
working out the best approach.

Robert could hardly have specifically promised that GNAT would
go into GCC 3.0 because (a) there was no firm release schedule
at that time anyway and (b) Robert is not the GCC release
manager :-)


Sent via Deja.com
http://www.deja.com/