From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,95ccd347a31905c3
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-02-09 18:44:28 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail
From: Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: GNAT not in gcc-3.0?
Date: 09 Feb 2001 18:44:26 -0800
Organization: Forte International Technical Consulting Services - +1 760 499
 9142
Message-ID: <m3hf23uuid.fsf_-_@yakisoba.forte-intl.com>
Sender: ronald@yakisoba.forte-intl.com
References: <3A819DD8.8643753E@home.com> <95s8fc$6s$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
 <Nc%g6.4$E04.287@typhoon.nyu.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley)
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5089
Date: 2001-02-09T18:44:26-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

I'd have sworn that Robert said that GNAT was going to be in gcc-3.0, but
by the looks of the official web page, it isn't:

        <http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-3.0/criteria.html>

-- 
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA  93556-1412
Ronald Cole <ronald@forte-intl.com>      Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO                             Fax: (760) 499-9152
My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084  4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B