From: DrPi <314@drpi.fr>
Subject: Re: Should light runtimes get more consideration?
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 15:42:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uf6k7r$4vc$1@rasp.pasdenom.info> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uf6768$7dtq$1@dont-email.me>
> WRT energy use. I use a low power run feature on the STM32L4 which means
> the
> system clock speed can change at any time. That seems to be incompatible
> with any runtime that I have seen except the minimal light-cortex-m4 one. I
> assume working with clocks is more scalable than working with runtimes but
> I do not know for sure.
>
The fact that the clock speed is hard coded is a design choice.
It simplifies the time management.
It makes the runtime more "hard real time" compliant since there are
less computations to be done at execution.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-29 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 11:44 Should light runtimes get more consideration? Kevin Chadwick
2023-09-28 3:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2023-09-28 9:46 ` Kevin Chadwick
2023-09-28 13:25 ` Simon Wright
2023-09-28 17:51 ` DrPi
2023-09-28 20:53 ` Simon Wright
2023-09-28 21:18 ` DrPi
2023-09-28 23:51 ` Chris Townley
2023-09-29 9:59 ` Kevin Chadwick
2023-09-29 10:42 ` Chris Townley
2023-09-29 13:44 ` DrPi
2023-09-29 13:42 ` DrPi [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox