From: Chris Townley <news@cct-net.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Should light runtimes get more consideration?
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2023 00:51:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <uf53hg$3l8cq$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uf4qio$2mc$1@rasp.pasdenom.info>
On 28/09/2023 22:18, DrPi wrote:
> Le 28/09/2023 à 22:53, Simon Wright a écrit :
>> DrPi <314@drpi.fr> writes:
>>
>>> Tasking is very limited. For example you can't use
>>> timeouts. Never. They propose a workaround but it is complex and not
>>> equivalent to a real timeout management.
>>
>> Not sure what a "real timeout management" would look like?
>>
>>> I'd like to have a full Ada RTS for embedded targets, like on
>>> desktop.
>>
>> Have you considered using something like a Raspberry Pi?
> A RaspberryPi is a computer (based on a microprocessor with an OS), not
> an micro-controller. It consumes a lot of electrical power. The OS
> (linux) is not real time. It uses a lot of board space. The processor is
> a proprietary black box...
>
Plenty use the Raspberry Pi as a microcontroller
--
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-28 23:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-26 11:44 Should light runtimes get more consideration? Kevin Chadwick
2023-09-28 3:48 ` Randy Brukardt
2023-09-28 9:46 ` Kevin Chadwick
2023-09-28 13:25 ` Simon Wright
2023-09-28 17:51 ` DrPi
2023-09-28 20:53 ` Simon Wright
2023-09-28 21:18 ` DrPi
2023-09-28 23:51 ` Chris Townley [this message]
2023-09-29 9:59 ` Kevin Chadwick
2023-09-29 10:42 ` Chris Townley
2023-09-29 13:44 ` DrPi
2023-09-29 13:42 ` DrPi
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox