From: Per Sandberg <per.s.sandberg@bahnhof.se>
Subject: Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
Date: Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:12:41 +0200
Date: 2016-09-17T16:12:41+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <tbcDz.1337078$Nz.211432@fx05.fr7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ef61dac-ba34-4fda-8405-1a09e77c76d3@googlegroups.com>
Why do you need another socket binding ????
Den 2016-09-16 kl. 22:58, skrev Daniel Norte Moraes:
> Hi!
>
> Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
>
> Thanks in Advance!
>
> []'s Dani.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-17 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg [this message]
2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-18 20:33 ` Stephen Leake
2016-09-18 21:56 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-19 17:04 ` jrmarino
2016-09-19 22:36 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-20 23:51 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox