From: Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org>
Subject: Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 13:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-09-18T13:33:59-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4b139bae-7a2b-49b6-9fa0-2e2dfd2387cb@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6e2b0f9d-1165-4bed-9163-6b8172684f61@googlegroups.com>
On Saturday, September 17, 2016 at 1:09:00 PM UTC-5, Daniel Norte Moraes wrote:
> sexta-feira, 16 de Setembro de 2016 às 17:58:49 UTC-3, Daniel Norte Moraes escreveu:
> > Hi!
> >
> > Are There alternatives to gnat.sockets ( with ipv6 and udp ) ?
> >
> > Thanks in Advance!
> >
> > []'s Dani.
>
> yes. ada.sockets dont permit 'bind' with ipv6.
>
> Thanks in Advance!
GNAT GPL 2016 GNAT.Sockets has support for ipv6 addresses.
So perhaps you need to upgrade.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-18 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg
2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-18 20:33 ` Stephen Leake [this message]
2016-09-18 21:56 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-19 17:04 ` jrmarino
2016-09-19 22:36 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-20 23:51 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox