From: Daniel Norte Moraes <danielcheagle@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ?
Date: Sun, 18 Sep 2016 14:56:54 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-09-18T14:56:54-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b912177-dc30-4acc-ae13-b553151add82@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ef61dac-ba34-4fda-8405-1a09e77c76d3@googlegroups.com>
Hi!
Gnat gpl 2016 gnat.sockets have ipv6 But only for 'connect'. I printed all sources and related sources just to discover => 'bind()' have a big 'raise exception' if the address is in ipv6. this was a unpleasant surprise.
my system use a ipv6+ipv4(in same network port, using ipv4 coded in ipv6[eg: ::ffff:1.2.3.4 ]). Without this, gnat.sockets ( a great initial promise) become useless to me. Well... Patience. :-)
[]'s Dani
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-09-18 21:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-16 20:58 IPv6 + UDP alternative to Gnat.Sockets ? Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-17 14:12 ` Per Sandberg
2016-09-17 18:08 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-18 20:33 ` Stephen Leake
2016-09-18 21:56 ` Daniel Norte Moraes [this message]
2016-09-19 17:04 ` jrmarino
2016-09-19 22:36 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
2016-09-20 23:51 ` Daniel Norte Moraes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox