From: agent@drrob1.com
Subject: Re: character literals
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 07:39:05 -0500
Date: 2014-02-14T07:39:05-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <oi3sf9huluv72pug6bf2gpsump2qodcvu2@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ldgckb$c40$1@dont-email.me
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 18:55:26 +0100, "J-P. Rosen" <rosen@adalog.fr>
wrote:
>Le 12/02/2014 16:53, Robert A Duff a écrit :
>>> This is a situation where some programmers might recommend making the
>>> > type Integer explicit.
>> Like me. I think the special-case for Integer is a kludge, so I
>> would write:
>>
>> for I in Some_Type range 0 .. 9 loop
><shameless_plug> and this can be enforced by AdaControl with the rule:
>check statements (untyped_for);
></shameless_plug>
I'll bite. What's AdaControl
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-14 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-11 22:27 character literals agent
2014-02-11 22:49 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-02-11 23:45 ` Bill Findlay
2014-02-11 23:49 ` Ludovic Brenta
2014-02-11 23:58 ` adambeneschan
2014-02-11 23:56 ` adambeneschan
2014-02-12 0:18 ` adambeneschan
2014-02-12 1:34 ` agent
2014-02-12 2:03 ` adambeneschan
2014-02-12 12:50 ` agent
2014-02-12 1:30 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-02-12 1:50 ` adambeneschan
2014-02-12 15:53 ` Robert A Duff
2014-02-12 17:55 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-02-14 12:39 ` agent [this message]
2014-02-14 18:36 ` AdaControl was: " Simon Clubley
2014-02-15 6:26 ` J-P. Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox