From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Subject: Re: Accessibility check failed
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 22:32:35 -0700
Date: 2014-08-10T22:32:35-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ls9khk$4tj$1@dont-email.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c4qn4nFbplvU1@mid.individual.net>
On 08/10/2014 07:12 PM, hreba wrote:
>
> in Proc generates a "accessibility check failed" error.
Accessibility checks are a major can of worms and why you should always avoid
visible access types if at all possible. This is aggravated by the use of
anonymous access types.
> So what is wrong?
The simple answer is unnecessary use of a visible access type, in this case an
anonymous access type.
--
Jeff Carter
"Little blondes with long hair and short skirts and
boots and big chests and bright, witty, and perceptive."
Play It Again, Sam
128
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-11 5:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-11 2:12 Accessibility check failed hreba
2014-08-11 5:32 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2014-08-11 16:45 ` hreba
2014-08-11 16:55 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-12 11:57 ` hreba
2014-08-11 19:56 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-11 20:17 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-11 20:28 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-11 21:14 ` Jeffrey Carter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-11-29 18:03 accessibility " Serge Robyns
2015-11-29 18:37 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-29 19:00 ` Serge Robyns
2015-11-29 22:32 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-29 22:53 ` Serge Robyns
2015-11-30 2:04 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-30 23:22 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-12-01 9:38 ` Serge Robyns
2015-11-29 19:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-29 22:40 ` Serge Robyns
2015-12-01 20:17 ` sbelmont700
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox