From: Serge Robyns <serge.robyns@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: accessibility check failed
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2015 11:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2015-11-29T11:00:23-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <44e20a95-703c-4316-8dda-aa2c8d07dfb1@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <n3fgg0$p2i$1@dont-email.me>
On Sunday, 29 November 2015 19:37:07 UTC+1, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> If you avoid both programming by extension and anonymous access-to-object types
> your code will be simpler, clearer, and you will avoid mysterious error msgs.
>
> If you further follow the design rule of no public access types things will be
> even better.
I'm trying to understand if this is a sarcastic comment or a genuine advise?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-11-29 19:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-29 18:03 accessibility check failed Serge Robyns
2015-11-29 18:37 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-29 19:00 ` Serge Robyns [this message]
2015-11-29 22:32 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-29 22:53 ` Serge Robyns
2015-11-30 2:04 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-11-30 23:22 ` Randy Brukardt
2015-12-01 9:38 ` Serge Robyns
2015-11-29 19:15 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-11-29 22:40 ` Serge Robyns
2015-12-01 20:17 ` sbelmont700
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-08-11 2:12 Accessibility " hreba
2014-08-11 5:32 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-11 16:45 ` hreba
2014-08-11 16:55 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-12 11:57 ` hreba
2014-08-11 19:56 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-11 20:17 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-08-11 20:28 ` sbelmont700
2014-08-11 21:14 ` Jeffrey Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox