From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jeffrey Carter <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Accessibility check failed
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2014 22:32:35 -0700
Organization: Also freenews.netfront.net; news.tornevall.net;
 news.eternal-september.org
Message-ID: <ls9khk$4tj$1@dont-email.me>
References: <c4qn4nFbplvU1@mid.individual.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 11 Aug 2014 05:32:37 +0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: mx05.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="a0c81a81d1281113b3831cf0c04e791a";
	logging-data="5043"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18G5XxZwR1e39LsFg5rskDuZ5Bwvx0sU0o="
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0
In-Reply-To: <c4qn4nFbplvU1@mid.individual.net>
Cancel-Lock: sha1:9hHylCFKfTaQMXTvboikCJ/DhGU=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:21653
Date: 2014-08-10T22:32:35-07:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

On 08/10/2014 07:12 PM, hreba wrote:
>
> in Proc generates a "accessibility check failed" error.

Accessibility checks are a major can of worms and why you should always avoid 
visible access types if at all possible. This is aggravated by the use of 
anonymous access types.

> So what is wrong?

The simple answer is unnecessary use of a visible access type, in this case an 
anonymous access type.

-- 
Jeff Carter
"Little blondes with long hair and short skirts and
boots and big chests and bright, witty, and perceptive."
Play It Again, Sam
128