From: "Frank J. Lhota" <NOSPAM.lhota.adarose@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: GNAT and Ada.Asynchronous_Task_Control
Date: Tue, 04 May 2004 20:34:20 GMT
Date: 2004-05-04T20:34:20+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <g7Tlc.8988$vz5.770@nwrdny01.gnilink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3111219.u9MCLuGHov@linux1.krischik.com
Looking at both the 3.15p version and the CVS version of GNAT, it appears
that the package System.Task_Primitives.Operations defines the procedures
Suspend_Task and Resume_Task needed to do the OS-specific work of
Ada.Asynchronous_Task_Control. This really has me puzzled, for it seems like
GNAT has 95% of the intrastructure needed for a portable implementation of
Ada.Asynchronous_Task_Control. Why not complete the job and implement the
package?
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-05-04 20:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-05-03 19:12 GNAT and Ada.Asynchronous_Task_Control Frank J. Lhota
2004-05-04 6:19 ` Martin Krischik
2004-05-04 13:53 ` Frank J. Lhota
2004-05-04 15:47 ` Martin Krischik
2004-05-04 17:49 ` Frank J. Lhota
2004-05-04 20:34 ` Frank J. Lhota [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox