From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Subject: Child packages named Ada illegal?
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:47:04 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-10-31T09:47:04-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c3f831f0-a622-4f20-9d9d-db035651758b@googlegroups.com> (raw)
I was getting misleading <<missing "with Ada...">> errors from GNAT (the packages were withen). In a moment of inspiration I renamed package AA.Languages.Ada to AA.Languages.Ada_Languages and all went well.
Just curious: was GNAT misbehaving (unlikely) or is it somehow forbidden to have child packages named Ada?
Thanks.
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 16:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-31 16:47 Marius Amado-Alves [this message]
2012-10-31 17:02 ` Child packages named Ada illegal? Shark8
2012-10-31 17:20 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-10-31 17:59 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2012-10-31 18:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-10-31 18:41 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2012-10-31 19:39 ` Shark8
2012-11-01 9:27 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox