From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Child packages named Ada illegal?
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 11:41:12 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-10-31T11:41:12-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa35c2a8-6350-4d32-bb20-dc8a207234a2@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2df4c08-401c-4a3e-a47d-fb718415c777@googlegroups.com>
>> ... The Standard.Ada trick doesn't work.
>
> Hmmm ... interesting, it should work.
Sorry, it does work. Sorry.
/*
I had boobed with the packages file names with all the renaming and copying. And I was writing "with Standard.Ada...." GNAT does not allow that. But we can with Ada.Characters and use Standard.Ada.Characters.
I had never wrote Standard.Ada... before. Sometimes I write Standard.Integer and such, but for some reason Standard.Ada looked strange to me.
*/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-31 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-31 16:47 Child packages named Ada illegal? Marius Amado-Alves
2012-10-31 17:02 ` Shark8
2012-10-31 17:20 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-10-31 17:59 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2012-10-31 18:16 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-10-31 18:41 ` Marius Amado-Alves [this message]
2012-10-31 19:39 ` Shark8
2012-11-01 9:27 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox