From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Possible Bug, Need Second Opinion
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 13:51:44 GMT
Date: 2001-09-24T13:51:44+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <QTGr7.2961$ev2.1814@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.1001275761.28439.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
In article <mailman.1001275761.28439.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>, ANH_VO@udlp.com
says...
>
>I am nearly 100% certain that the codes below should compile fine. But, I would
>like to have second opinion possibly more before reporting it.
..
>not match those of formal "Element_Array"'. On the other hand, if Size_T on
>lines 8 and 12 is fully qualified as shown below, the compiler was happy.
Its tempting to term anything that encourages full qualification as a "feature".
:-)
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-24 13:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-23 18:01 Possible Bug, Need Second Opinion ANH_VO
2001-09-23 21:18 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-24 13:51 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-09-25 18:51 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox