From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Possible Bug, Need Second Opinion
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 23:18:06 +0200
Date: 2001-09-23T23:18:06+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lmj5fvxt.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.1001275761.28439.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
ANH_VO@udlp.com writes:
> However, when compiled using GNAT 3.13p on Windows 95, the compiler
> complains with an error message of 'index_rejection.ads:14:32: index
> types of actual do not match those of formal "Element_Array"'.
Further experiments suggest that GNAT performs the name resolution for
generic actual parameters in the context of the generic, and not in
instantiating context. (Sorry, the terminology is probably
non-standard.)
I don't know if this is a property of the Ada language, but I would be
surprised if it was.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-23 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-23 18:01 Possible Bug, Need Second Opinion ANH_VO
2001-09-23 21:18 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2001-09-24 13:51 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-25 18:51 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox