Re: Can't access record attribute in derived type

[Mart van de Wege <mvdwege@gmail.com>]

"G.B." <bauhaus@notmyhomepage.invalid> writes:

> On 08/03/2017 15:15, Mart van de Wege wrote:
>> The declarations are private, but shouldn't a
>> tagged type inherit the entire record of its parent type? That means
>> that it should have a Parents selector, shouldn't it?
>
> Just to make sure, is this also a hierarchy of child
> packages, like
>
> P
>   Creature
> P.C
>   Person
> P.C.G
>   Knight
>
> so that every derived type's definition has visibility
> into the respective parent package's private part?
>
Yep, it is.

Mart
-- 
"We will need a longer wall when the revolution comes."
    --- AJS, quoting an uncertain source.