From: chris <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: generic imports? void* -> generics?
Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2003 00:01:36 +0100
Date: 2003-09-20T00:01:36+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7RLab.3789$I9.2507@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <uwuc4mmeo.fsf@earthlink.net>
Matthew Heaney wrote:
> There's no binding to C type void* in Interfaces.C, but type
> System.Address should work OK. That way you can say:
That was what I was going to do (did that in the past), but I wondered
if there was a safer way. I might go with it as it's simple enough to
implement.
> This is wrong, because your Ada function to_userdata returns an object,
> not a pointer to object, as the C function does. You need to bind to an
> access type, like this:
I changed it to use an access type in the spec, but the problem was the
compiler rejected any attempt in the spec to specify the convention of a
generic type.
> function To_Userdata
> (L : lua_state_access;
> Pos : Index) return Userdata is
>
snip
> Result : constant Userdata_Access :=
> lua_touserdata(L, Pos);
> begin
> return Result.all;
> end;
Never thought of that, thanks.
Thanks,
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-19 23:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-19 19:20 generic imports? void* -> generics? chris
2003-09-19 20:46 ` chris
2003-09-19 21:18 ` Nick Roberts
2003-09-19 23:12 ` chris
2003-09-20 16:52 ` Simon Wright
2003-09-22 21:30 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-09-23 5:45 ` Simon Wright
2003-09-23 19:07 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-09-23 20:28 ` Simon Wright
2003-09-24 18:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-09-19 22:40 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-09-19 23:01 ` chris [this message]
2003-09-20 1:59 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-09-20 13:52 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-09-23 22:39 ` chris
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox