Re: Ada Dot Net ?

["WJT" <bthomas@aisvt.bfg.com>]

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1001 bytes --]


"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrnaa97pv.s2.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no...
> On Fri, 29 Mar 2002 16:27:45 GMT, WJT wrote:
>
> > make Ada his own, besides that I believe that MS is starting to
understand
> > the benefits of ISO standardization. They have submitted C# and the
Common
> > Language Infrastructure to the ECMA (which is what I'm told the fast
track
> > to ISO standardization).
>
> So what? If Mircosoft controls the ISO then it doesn't matter. Mickysoft
> is going to whatever they can to prevent portability.

After twenty years in the Ada scheme of things I'm willing to sacrifice a
little portability in order to get the power I need on the Windows platform.
Besides this is Ada, if you architect you system correctly you should be
isolating you 'dependent things' into layers and subsystems and keeping the
rest of you application true and ...Green.

> --
> Preben Randhol         �For me, Ada95 puts back the joy in programming.�