From: Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com>
Subject: Re: Unchecked_Deallocation subtleties
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 23:42:03 GMT
Date: 2003-04-14T23:42:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yecr8844pdh.fsf@king.cts.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: oprndn2ktgbqmqul@news.cis.dfn.de
Nick Roberts <nickroberts@blueyonder.co.uk> writes:
[...]
> Presumably the Ada compiler that NASA uses for the Space Shuttle's
> flight software will not (and should not) be quite the same as the
> Ada compiler I use for my train set controller.
Why not? If there's an Ada compiler of high enough quality to use for
the Space Shuttle's flight software, why shouldn't you use the same
compiler for your train set controller?
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://www.sdsc.edu/~kst>
Schroedinger does Shakespeare: "To be *and* not to be"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-14 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-09 9:10 Unchecked_Deallocation subtleties Piotr Zgorecki
2003-04-09 9:46 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-09 12:19 ` Marin David Condic
2003-04-09 12:37 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-10 12:02 ` Marin David Condic
2003-04-09 16:54 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-04-09 20:19 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-09 21:39 ` Samuel Tardieu
2003-04-10 11:37 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-10 14:39 ` Robert Spooner
2003-04-10 16:39 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-04-09 19:50 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-10 15:04 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-10 16:40 ` chris.danx
2003-04-14 23:42 ` Keith Thompson [this message]
2003-04-15 1:54 ` Nick Roberts
2003-04-15 12:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-04-15 12:13 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2003-04-19 8:57 ` AG
2003-04-09 21:23 ` Randy Brukardt
2003-04-10 11:49 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox