From: Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com>
Subject: Re: Unsupported Annexes
Date: 1999/11/26
Date: 1999-11-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yecemdd2g97.fsf@king.cts.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1e1urrd.1fjz88r1pc4s2jN%dwalker07@snet.net.invalid
dwalker07@snet.net.invalid (Daryle Walker) writes:
> Hmm, maybe this should be in comp.compilers....
>
> This question is for the Ada compiler creators. When a compiler doesn't
> support a particular annex, do the structures in the annex still have to
> be parsed?
None of the optional annexes define new syntax or keywords. You'll
get diagnostics for unimplemented pragmas, attributes, and packages,
but no syntax errors.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://www.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"Oh my gosh! You are SO ahead of your time!" -- anon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-26 0:00 Unsupported Annexes Daryle Walker
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Keith Thompson [this message]
1999-11-27 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox