From: Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com>
Subject: Re: FY Ammo: Study about Security Bugs
Date: 1999/11/26
Date: 1999-11-26T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yecd7sx2g16.fsf@king.cts.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 81m32q$bji$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar <dewar@gnat.com> writes:
[...]
> In GNAT, there is a pragma Unsuppress (now being discussed for
> semi-standardization) that can be used either as a configuration
> pragma, or locally to ensure that checks are on, even if they
> were turned off at the command line level. Unsuppress has
> exactly the same form and usage as Suppress.
BTW, TeleSoft's Ada-83 compiler had a pragma No_Suppress with the same
semantics.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) kst@cts.com <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
San Diego Supercomputer Center <*> <http://www.sdsc.edu/~kst>
"Oh my gosh! You are SO ahead of your time!" -- anon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-25 0:00 FY Ammo: Study about Security Bugs Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-11-25 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-11-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Keith Thompson [this message]
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Gisle S�lensminde
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-26 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox