From: chris <spamoff.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: Re: Expectation of Access Value Equality
Date: Fri, 05 Sep 2003 15:02:41 +0200
Date: 2003-09-05T15:02:41+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yE06b.1987$Ve3.865@newsfep4-winn.server.ntli.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bja3fi$glkjh$1@ID-25716.news.uni-berlin.de>
Nick Roberts wrote:
> (c) What would you think of an implementation that caused this behaviour?
> (What would you think of an implementation that printed four lines in both
> cases?)
It wouldn't be obeying the typing rules of the language. Perhaps you
meant A_String_Array to accesses to A_String? If so,
(a) I would expect 4 lines
(b) ditto
(c) it'd be working correctly iiu the languages rules correctly.
> (d) I'd be grateful for a very brief indication of your level and broad
> area(s) of programming experience, in Ada and other languages.
Familiar: Ada, Java, Pascal
Ok: C, SQL
Dabbled In: C++, Erlang, Haskell
I'm a student with 0 years industry service behind me so I don't use Ada
everyday, if that's relevant.
Chris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-09-05 13:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-05 13:35 Expectation of Access Value Equality Nick Roberts
2003-09-05 13:02 ` chris [this message]
2003-09-05 17:56 ` Nick Roberts
2003-09-05 19:10 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-09-05 19:32 ` Jeffrey Carter
2003-09-05 19:35 ` Simon Wright
2003-09-06 0:25 ` Matthew Heaney
2003-09-06 2:41 ` Steve
2003-09-06 22:01 ` Georg Bauhaus
2003-09-08 9:08 ` Preben Randhol
2003-09-08 9:09 ` Andy
2003-09-09 22:31 ` Nick Roberts
2003-09-10 18:39 ` Mário Amado Alves
2003-09-23 10:46 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox