From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Possible GNAT problem with aliased parameters.
Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2013 09:48:09 +0200
Date: 2013-10-19T09:48:09+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xvb4gxnwhbca$.56scb80x1swp.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 0bb058fa-df1b-4092-a6f9-47d12a5f5791@googlegroups.com
On Fri, 18 Oct 2013 22:48:58 -0700 (PDT), Shark8 wrote:
> Right, I was hoping to avoid containers for the time being... and they
> wouldn't help in this instance, would they?
No. Refactoring graph nodes (and subgraphs) requires [much] work that
standard containers do not. You will need reference counting scheme and
hash function of subgraphs.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-19 7:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-18 16:01 Possible GNAT problem with aliased parameters Shark8
2013-10-18 16:51 ` sbelmont700
2013-10-19 1:59 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-10-19 5:48 ` Shark8
2013-10-19 7:48 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2013-10-19 14:30 ` sbelmont700
2013-10-19 21:17 ` Shark8
2013-10-20 6:29 ` Shark8
2013-10-20 15:33 ` sbelmont700
2013-10-21 0:29 ` Shark8
2013-10-21 0:55 ` sbelmont700
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox