From: Kilgallen@SpamCop.net (Larry Kilgallen)
Subject: Re: Various Language Architecture Questions
Date: 25 Sep 2005 08:24:32 -0500
Date: 2005-09-25T08:24:32-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <xCqDBI002kGJ@eisner.encompasserve.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1127652977.471484.203180@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com
In article <1127652977.471484.203180@g47g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>, frankgerlach@gmail.com writes:
> 2.) Using Unchecked_conversion() in Ada kills range checking ? That
> seems to be inferior to java...
Using Unchecked_conversion in general is inferior to not using it,
but there are many capabilities in Ada to avoid the temptation to
use Unchecked_conversion. You should revisit the exact reason why
you think Unchecked_conversion is necessary in your Ada program.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-25 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-25 2:37 Various Language Architecture Questions frankgerlach
2005-09-25 5:07 ` jimmaureenrogers
2005-09-25 7:24 ` Martin Dowie
2005-09-25 8:17 ` Martin Krischik
2005-09-25 8:53 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-09-25 12:56 ` frankgerlach
2005-09-25 13:24 ` Larry Kilgallen [this message]
2005-09-25 14:04 ` Pascal Obry
2005-09-25 14:24 ` Martin Krischik
2005-09-25 15:25 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-09-25 15:32 ` Georg Bauhaus
2005-09-25 16:02 ` Pascal Obry
2005-09-25 16:02 ` Pascal Obry
2005-09-26 7:44 ` Maciej Sobczak
2005-09-26 21:07 ` Florian Weimer
2005-09-27 4:31 ` Simon Wright
2005-09-27 7:18 ` Tapio Kelloniemi
2005-09-27 23:43 ` Florian Weimer
2005-09-28 20:43 ` Simon Wright
2005-09-29 23:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-09-26 21:05 ` Florian Weimer
2005-09-25 11:57 ` Marin David Condic
2005-09-25 15:21 ` Björn Persson
2005-09-25 22:25 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2005-09-26 18:09 ` David Emery
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox