comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Documentation Standards
Date: 16 Aug 2001 20:53:29 +0100
Date: 2001-08-16T19:53:29+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vzo8zkchy.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B7BD023.85AEA7F5@raytheon.com

Mark Johnson <mark_h_johnson@raytheon.com> writes:

> "John R. Strohm" wrote:

> > Alternatively, if anyone can point me at a bootleg site with the
> > full set for DOD-STD-2167A, i.e., the standard and all the related
> > DIDs, that would also be good.

I have some stuff at http://www.pushface.org/mil_498.html. Not so sure
about the "bootleg" part, DoD were keen that all & sundry should be
able to get their hands on it ..

> A couple minute search using Altavista found a copy of the following
> "notice of cancellation" for MIL-STD-498 (the successor to
> 2167A). As mentioned below, the IEEE has current standards that you
> can purchase, subscribe to, etc. I doubt the pricing is current :-).

That only means that DoD don't require it. The standard still exists,
and eg the UK MoD are still quite happy for people to use it. If you
want DIDs you will need to stick with 498 (or 2167A, I guess).



  parent reply	other threads:[~2001-08-16 19:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2001-08-16  4:10 Documentation Standards John R. Strohm
2001-08-16 13:52 ` Mark Johnson
2001-08-16 15:28   ` Jerry Petrey
2001-08-16 19:53   ` Simon Wright [this message]
2001-08-17 14:34   ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-16 13:53 ` Marin David Condic
2001-08-17 14:08 ` DuckE
2001-08-18 13:42 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-08-20 14:07   ` Mark
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox