From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: A generic list package
Date: 19 Sep 2001 20:45:09 +0100
Date: 2001-09-19T19:45:09+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vzo7rdkxm.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrn9qgkec.jt.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de
lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) writes:
> * Simon Wright wrote:
> >lutz@iks-jena.de (Lutz Donnerhacke) writes:
> >> I prefer this the other way around:
> >>
> >> +------------------+
> >> | actual data |
> >> | |
> >> | fields specific |
> >> | to the container |
> >>
> >> This allows me to cast pointers ;-)
> >
> >Eeww.
> >
> >I hope you put representation clauses on your records, then.
>
> Not necessary.
What makes you think that the order the compiler lays out the record
is the same as the order you wrote the components in?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-19 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-02 22:13 A generic list package (long) Florian Weimer
2001-09-02 22:29 ` Stephen Leake
2001-09-03 9:53 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-03 16:18 ` A generic list package Florian Weimer
2001-09-03 17:16 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-09-04 9:40 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-04 16:42 ` Stephen Leake
2001-09-18 14:58 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-09-18 19:07 ` Simon Wright
2001-09-19 8:05 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-09-19 19:45 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2001-09-20 8:21 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox