From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: dinamic object reclamation
Date: 19 Sep 2001 20:51:08 +0100
Date: 2001-09-19T19:51:08+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vwv2vdknn.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9oangi$dp8$1@ns.omskelecom.ru
"Anisimkov" <anisimkov@yahoo.com> writes:
> > >But there is more then limit of memory usage
> > >becouse I wrote
> > > for Block_Ptr'Storage_Size use Integer'Last;
> > >inside of procedure "act".
> > >
> > >and memory is not leaking now.
> >
> > >It looks like a trick.
> >
> > Well, it is. But it is clearly one that was placed into the language on
> purpose.
> > :-)
>
> The one reasonable explanation i can imagine is
> that when we declearing
> for Block_Ptr'Storage_Size use Integer'Last;
> GNAT creates storage_pool locally in the "act" procedure.
> and when we are leaving this procedure
> storage pool Finalized.
Exactly so.
> Could be nice to have standard way to declate
> access type with a local storage pool.
I rather think that this is it!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-19 19:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-19 14:27 dinamic object reclamation Anisimkov
2001-09-19 14:55 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-19 17:44 ` Anisimkov
2001-09-19 17:15 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-19 19:21 ` Anisimkov
2001-09-19 19:18 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-19 19:51 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2001-09-19 15:02 ` David C. Hoos
2001-09-19 19:28 ` Anisimkov
2001-09-19 19:21 ` David C. Hoos
2001-09-19 21:47 ` Stephen Leake
2001-09-20 2:43 ` David Botton
2001-09-20 7:39 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-09-20 13:21 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox