From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: GNAT naming convention for seperate?
Date: 09 Jun 2001 07:36:30 +0100
Date: 2001-06-09T06:36:30+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vu21qjh1t.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B2102E9.729F3F9@sonetcom.com
"Harry E. Tucker" <snagaghash@sonetcom.com> writes:
> Hi,
>
> What is the naming convention for seperate procedures? Yes, I'm being
> lazy here. I've looked around the docs and just can't find a reference.
If you have
separate (Foo.Bar)
procedure P is ....
it needs to be in file
foo-bar-p.adb
(you could of course always have run gnatchop on the source file to
get the answer!)
Or perhaps -- what _do_ you mean by "naming convention for seperate
procedures"? (NB spelling of "sepArate")
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-09 6:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-08 16:52 GNAT naming convention for seperate? Harry E. Tucker
2001-06-09 6:36 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2001-06-09 11:16 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-06-23 11:30 ` Carbonne Damien
2001-06-23 14:29 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox