From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: Fussy Standard: what is modulo Address?
Date: 22 Jan 2003 23:06:29 +0000
Date: 2003-01-22T23:06:29+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vu1g0aioa.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3e2f1663$0$33931$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
> The manual should define relations between System.Address and
> System.Storage_Element.Integer_Address. To define these seems being
> just forgotten. No these relations which should be true accordingly
> human intuition may have bad impact on reliability.
It seems to me that when the ARM goes to some trouble to say that
System.Address is implementation-defined it is probably deliberate.
And there is a perfectly clear relation between System.Address and
System.Storage_Elements.Integer_Address in the functions
System.Storage_Elements.To_Address, To_Integer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-01-22 23:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-01-22 8:05 Fussy Standard: what is modulo Address? Grein, Christoph
2003-01-22 16:40 ` Robert A Duff
2003-01-22 20:21 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-22 23:06 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2003-01-23 0:23 ` Robert A Duff
2003-01-23 13:12 ` Wes Groleau
2003-01-23 14:10 ` Robert A Duff
2003-01-23 0:43 ` Victor Porton
2003-01-23 14:06 ` Robert A Duff
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-01-23 6:53 Grein, Christoph
2003-01-22 7:33 Victor Porton
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox