From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: milliseconds and delay until
Date: 14 Jun 2003 07:04:42 +0100
Date: 2003-06-14T07:04:42+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vu1at2o05.fsf@pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bcas1p$fcu$1@sparta.btinternet.com
"Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com> writes:
> "Simon Wright" <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message
> news:x7vd6hjdoun.fsf@pushface.org...
>
> > This depends on your compiler's runtime. I think you will find for
> > GNAT that it makes very little difference (certainly 3.15a1 fails
> > to comply with ARM D.8(32), "A clock jump is the difference
> > between two successive distinct values of the clock (as observed
> > by calling the Clock function). There shall be no backward clock
> > jumps.".
>
> Which sentence doesn't it comply with?
The one with the requirement (the "shall") in it!
prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-06-14 6:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-11 18:31 milliseconds and delay until Thomas Bruns
2003-06-11 18:46 ` Jano
2003-06-11 18:58 ` Thomas Bruns
2003-06-11 19:29 ` Jano
2003-06-11 19:49 ` Simon Wright
2003-06-11 20:29 ` tmoran
2003-06-12 6:20 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2003-06-11 19:59 ` Frank J. Lhota
2003-06-12 3:06 ` Steve
2003-06-12 20:26 ` Simon Wright
2003-06-12 21:41 ` Martin Dowie
2003-06-14 6:04 ` Simon Wright [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox