From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: GNAT and GCC compatability.
Date: 1999/09/29
Date: 1999-09-29T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vr9jii9jm.fsf@pogner.moho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87n1u6khco.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org
Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> writes:
> Note that you shouldn't build the C++ compiler from a GNAT-patched
> source tree, because some portions of the GCC backend are also changed
> and the resulting C++ compiler, which would include these changes as
> well, hasn't been tested.
The (admittedly minimal) C++ code I've built with such a beast has
given me no problems.
Just one (rather vague) datum, of course!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-29 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-28 0:00 GNAT and GCC compatability Larry Stanbery
1999-09-28 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
1999-09-28 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-09-29 0:00 ` Larry Stanbery
1999-09-29 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
1999-09-29 0:00 ` Simon Wright [this message]
1999-09-30 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox