comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Tasking Models
Date: 2000/04/20
Date: 2000-04-20T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vpurkd1aa.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38FDDF83.26B5DC76@quadruscorp.com

"Marin D. Condic" <mcondic-nospam@quadruscorp.com> writes:

> I've been told that TCP/IP would sort it out - no interleaving of
> message fragments at least - which would mean that two tasks writing to
> the same socket would be O.K. But getting told that by someone is not
> the same as reading it in a document written by the good folks who
> brought you the software. I lose sleep at night over stuff like this.
> :-)

That sounds like a design I would lose sleep over .. I guess if you
always write complete messages you would probably be OK, but I've
usually used the "write the message descriptor, then write the
message" style. Still, you really need to see inside that networking
stack.




  reply	other threads:[~2000-04-20  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-04-18  0:00 Tasking Models Marin D. Condic
2000-04-19  0:00 ` Gisle S�lensminde
2000-04-19  0:00   ` Marin D. Condic
2000-04-20  0:00     ` Simon Wright [this message]
2000-04-22  0:00       ` Marin D. Condic
2000-04-22  0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-04-22  0:00   ` tmoran
2000-04-22  0:00     ` Marin D. Condic
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox