From: Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org>
Subject: Re: [GNAT commercial USE] -- can i use GNAT to develop a closed source commercial application ?
Date: 17 Aug 2003 12:35:57 +0100
Date: 2003-08-17T12:35:57+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vptj4o6si.fsf@smaug.pushface.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3F3DA297.1000406@attbi.com
"Robert I. Eachus" <rieachus@attbi.com> writes:
> Simon Wright wrote:
>
> > Nor would GCC's C, C++ compilers be, of course.
> > I expect you could get GNAT certified, but you would have to pay ACT
> > quite a bit of money.
> It doesn't cost that much to get a validated version of GNAT.
Come to think, the quote was for an early run of the certification
process -- it's cheaper if you can agree to defer to a convenient
moment, I guess, perfectly reasonable.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-08-17 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-08-14 22:42 [GNAT commercial USE] -- can i use GNAT to develop a closed source commercial application ? Marco Poggioli
2003-08-14 23:24 ` Chad R. Meiners
2003-08-15 3:42 ` Steve
2003-08-15 8:28 ` Marco Poggioli
2003-08-15 8:44 ` Preben Randhol
2003-08-15 12:02 ` Marco Poggioli (a fake exposed name)
2003-08-15 13:40 ` Steve
2003-08-15 13:42 ` Steve
2003-08-15 7:30 ` Erlo Haugen
2003-08-15 8:38 ` Preben Randhol
2003-08-15 19:40 ` Simon Wright
2003-08-16 3:18 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-08-17 11:35 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2003-08-15 8:47 ` Pascal Obry
2003-08-15 23:24 ` Marco Poggioli (a fake exposed name)
2003-08-17 17:43 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox