From: Simon Wright <simon@pogner.demon.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Ada to Motif bindings
Date: 2000/04/11
Date: 2000-04-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <x7vln2lmatq.fsf@pogner.demon.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8ct3pv$cnl$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:
> As an aside, I have seen X/Motif bindings that made the whole X/Motif
> subsystem task-safe by wrapping a synchronizing task around all the
> calls. This actually *removes* a potential source of errors that C X
> coders have to deal with. :-)
Or, with X11R6 (OK, your X vendor needs to have built X with threading
support :), use XInitThreads(), XtToolkitThreadInitialize() (but I
don't know what happens with Motif).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-03 0:00 Ada to Motif bindings John Standard
2000-04-03 0:00 ` David Botton
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ada to XRT bindings John Standard
2000-04-15 0:00 ` james hopper
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ada to Motif bindings Glen Cornell
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Marc CHEVRIER
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Glen Cornell
2000-04-06 0:00 ` dale
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Glen Cornell
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Simon Wright [this message]
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Simon Wright
2000-04-05 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox